Flexible access? Digitalisation of Danish healthcare through video consultations
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Book chapter
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Book chapter
Peer-reviewHost publication Subtitle
Sociotechnical Approaches to Service DeliveryOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 203-217 (15 pages)Publication milestones
- Published - 21/08/2025
Publication status
Published - 21/08/2025
Publisher
Edward Elgar PublishingISBN (Electronic)
978 1 0353 3815 3Chapter Number
13Publication IDs
- ORCID: /0000-0001-7102-7268/work/190555331
- Scopus: 105021637867
Host publication title
Digitalization, Data and WelfareHost publication editors
- Vasilis Galis
- Vasileios-Spyridon Vlassis
Abstract
This chapter brings attention to the political ideal of ‘flexible access’ to healthcare services. We situate flexibility in the context of a welfare state seeking to achieve efficiency and self-service by means of digitalisation and aim to provide empirical answers to how flexible access unfolds and is experienced in practice. Through ethnographic studies of video consultations in hospital outpatient clinics, we show how the flexibility of location offered by the video consultation creates different freedoms and conveniences for patients. However, values other than flexible access figure in patients’ preferences for their interactions with clinicians. Furthermore, achieving flexible access requires specific equipment, skills, and adaptability, and sometimes a need for assistance to obtain access. With the current push for virtual consultations and treatment in the home, these empirical insights contribute important knowledge about potential benefits, as well as obstacles and tensions that arise in the move to digital healthcare services.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
1
Funding Details
The Velux Foundation and the IT University of Copenhagen funded the research for this chapter under the Welfare after Digitalization project, grant number 26584.
