Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Why do Family Members Reject AI in Health Care? Competing Effects of Emotions

  • Eun Hee Park
    ,
  • ,
  • Lan Cao
    ,
  • Balasubramaniam Ramesh
  • Old Dominion University
    ,
  • University of Cologne
    ,
  • Georgia State University
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 765-792 (28 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Management Information Systems (Volume 39, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/07/2022

Publication status

Published - 01/07/2022

ISSN

0742-1222

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85136877550

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) enables continuous monitoring of patients’ health, thus improving the quality of their health care. However, prior studies suggest that individuals resist such innovative technology. In contrast to prior studies that investigate individuals’ decisions for themselves, we focus on family members’ rejection of AI monitoring, as family members play a significant role in health care decisions. Our research investigates competing effects of emotions toward the rejection of AI monitoring for health care. Based on two scenario-based experiments, our study reveals that emotions play a decisive role in family members’ decision making on behalf of their parents. We find that anxiety about health care monitoring and anxiety about health outcomes reduce the rejection of AI monitoring, whereas surveillance anxiety and delegation anxiety increase rejection. We also find that for individual-level risks, perceived controllability moderates the relationship between surveillance anxiety and the rejection of AI monitoring. We contribute to the theory of Information System rejection by identifying the competing roles of emotions in AI monitoring decision making. We extend the literature on decision making for others by suggesting the influential role of anxiety. We also contribute to healthcare research in Information System by identifying the important role of controllability, a design factor, in AI monitoring rejection

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
76
Captures
207
Usage
707