Urban highways are barriers to social ties
- ,
- Anastassia Vybornova,
- Sándor Juhász,
- ,
- Eszter Bokányi
- ,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- Corvinus University of Budapest,
- University of Amsterdam
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishArticle number
e2408937122Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1-10 (10 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Volume 122, Issue 10)Publication milestones
- Published - 04/03/2025
Publication status
Published - 04/03/2025
ISSN
0027-8424Publication IDs
- Scopus: 86000234747
Abstract
Urban highways are common, especially in the United States, making cities more car-centric. They promise the annihilation of distance but obstruct pedestrian mobility, thus playing a key role in limiting social interactions locally. Although this limiting role is widely acknowledged in urban studies, the quantitative relationship between urban highways and social ties is barely tested. Here, we define a Barrier Score that relates massive, geolocated online social network data to highways in the 50 largest US cities. At the granularity of individual social ties, we show that urban highways are associated with decreased social connectivity. This barrier effect is especially strong for short distances and consistent with historical cases of highways that were built to purposefully disrupt or isolate Black neighborhoods. By combining spatial infrastructure with social tie data, our method adds a dimension to demographic studies of social segregation. Our study can inform reparative planning for an evidence-based reduction of spatial inequality, and more generally, support a better integration of the social fabric in urban planning.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
44
Mentions
9
Citations
20
Funding Details
L.M.A. acknowledges funding from Carlsberg Foundation Project COCOONS (Grant ID: CF210432). M.S. acknowledges funding from European Union Horizon Project JUST STREETS (Grant agreement ID: 101104240). S.J. acknowledges funding from EU Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme (Grant number 101062606)
Access to documents
Final published version, 18.44 MB
