Trusting elections: complexities and risks of digital voting in Denmark
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1-18 (18 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Journal of Cultural EconomyPublication milestones
- E-pub ahead of print - 2023
- Published - 2023
Publication status
Published - 2023
ISSN
1753-0350Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85170662605
Abstract
It is often said that election processes depend on trust for their legitimacy. Trust is therefore crucial to the sustainability of democracy. It also seems clear that patterns and forms of trust in Western democracies are changing in tandem with digitalization. This paper explores some possible inflections of the concept of trust in the ‘age of digitalization’ by examining its articulation by computer scientists doing research on digital voting and by contrasting these articulations with a Science and Technology Studies (STS) analysis of trust in the Danish voting process. The motivation for characterizing and discussing these views of trust, is that it matters deeply how trust is conceptualized in relation to voting, democracy and beyond, and that today computer science as an engineering, scientific and intellectual field increasingly affects how we perceive of trust – indeed, how we organize social life and come to think about the world we live in. If Digitalization appears to be implicated in the current transformation of trust, then the questions of how trust is defined, by whom, and with what implications are open and acute matters in need of more general awareness and careful attention.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
1
Captures
20
Funding Details
This work was supported by The Danish Council for Strategic Research [grant number 10-092309].
FundersFunding numbers
Danish Council for Strategic Research
10-092309
Access to documents
Accepted author manuscript, 1.32 MB
License:CC BY-NC, opens in new tab
Final published version, 2.36 MB
