Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context: The Role of Decision-making and Accountability

  • Copenhagen Business School
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Research
Peer-review

Abstract

The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance – namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 306-322 (17 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Government Information Quarterly (Volume 35)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2018

Publication status

Published - 2018

ISSN

0740-624X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85028720331

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
632
Citation count
116