Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The limits of automatic summarisation according to ROUGE

Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 41–45 (5 pages)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2017

Publication status

Published - 2017

Volume

2

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics, United States
978-1-945626-34-0

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85021690990

Host publication title

Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

This paper discusses some central caveats of summarisation, incurred in the use of
the ROUGE metric for evaluation, with respect to optimal solutions. The task is NPhard, of which we give the first proof. Still, as we show empirically for three central benchmark datasets for the task, greedy algorithms empirically seem to perform optimally according to the metric. Additionally, overall quality assurance is problematic: there is no natural upper bound on the quality of summarisation systems, and even humans are excluded from performing optimal summarisation.

Publication metrics

PlumX

Captures
141
Citations
118

Related Event

Title

The 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Event type

Conference

Degree of recognition

International event

Date

03/04/2017 - 07/04/2017

Location

ValenciaSpain