Striving for scientific discourse on information systems development research

This paper critiques the framework proposed by Hirschheim, Klein, and Lyytinen for classifying approaches in information systems development (ISD) research. The authors emphasize the importance of integrating multiple perspectives, recognizing the interplay between technology and social dimensions in ISD. Key concerns include the clarity and defensibility of the proposed classification and the need for a more systematic approach to advance scientific discourse in the field, ultimately seeking to reduce fragmentation and enhance the coherence of ISD methodologies.