Reserve your judgment on “Draconian” Chinese video gaming restrictions on children • Commentary on: Draconian policy measures are unlikely to prevent disordered gaming (Colder Carras et al., 2021)
- Leon Y. Xiao
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Comment/debate
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Comment/debate
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishJournal (Volume, Issue Number)
Journal of Behavioral AddictionsPublication milestones
- Published - 27/05/2022
Publication status
Published - 27/05/2022
ISSN
2062-5871Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85134800959
Abstract
China imposed strict restrictions on young people's participation in videogaming from September 2021. Colder Carras et al.'s commentary (2021) referred to this policy as ‘draconian,’ i.e., ‘excessively harsh and severe.’ However, any opinion on whether this policy is ‘draconian’ is a value judgment, and any judgment on its ‘effectiveness’ ought to be reserved until proven or disproven by empirical evidence. Indeed, the Chinese policy is neither potentially ineffective nor draconian, and is already providing at least one identifiable benefit: enhancing consumer protection by effectively reducing underage players' monetary spending on videogames, including on randomised, gambling-like mechanics known as ‘loot boxes.’
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
14
Captures
41
