Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Reserve your judgment on “Draconian” Chinese video gaming restrictions on children • Commentary on: Draconian policy measures are unlikely to prevent disordered gaming (Colder Carras et al., 2021)

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Comment/debate
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Comment/debate
Peer-review

Original language

English

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Publication milestones

  • Published - 27/05/2022

Publication status

Published - 27/05/2022

ISSN

2062-5871

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85134800959

Abstract

China imposed strict restrictions on young people's participation in videogaming from September 2021. Colder Carras et al.'s commentary (2021) referred to this policy as ‘draconian,’ i.e., ‘excessively harsh and severe.’ However, any opinion on whether this policy is ‘draconian’ is a value judgment, and any judgment on its ‘effectiveness’ ought to be reserved until proven or disproven by empirical evidence. Indeed, the Chinese policy is neither potentially ineffective nor draconian, and is already providing at least one identifiable benefit: enhancing consumer protection by effectively reducing underage players' monetary spending on videogames, including on randomised, gambling-like mechanics known as ‘loot boxes.’

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
14
Captures
41