Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Repeatability and Workability Evaluation of SIGMOD 2011

  • Philippe Bonnet(Author)
    ,
  • Philippe Bonnet, Stefan Manegold, Matias Bjorling, Wei Cao, Javier Gonzales, Joel Granados, Nancy Hall, Stratos Idreos, Milena Ivanova, Ryan Johnson, David Koop, Tim Kraska, René Müller, Dan Olteanu, Paolo Papotti, Christine Reilly, Dimitris Tsirogiannis, Cong Yu, Juliana Freire and Dennis Shasha
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 45-48 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

S I G M O D Record (Volume 40, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2011

Publication status

Published - 2011

ISSN

0163-5808

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 80053402117

Abstract

SIGMOD has offered, since 2008, to verify the experiments published in the papers accepted at the conference. This year, we have been in charge of reproducing
the experiments provided by the authors (repeatability),
and exploring changes to experiment parameters (workability). In this paper, we assess the SIGMOD repeatability process in terms of participation, review process
and results. While the participation is stable in terms of
number of submissions, we find this year a sharp contrast between the high participation from Asian authors
and the low participation from American authors. We
also find that most experiments are distributed as Linux
packages accompanied by instructions on how to setup
and run the experiments. We are still far from the vision
of executable papers

Publication metrics

PlumX

Citations
23
Captures
16