Quicksort, Largest Bucket, and Min-Wise Hashing with Limited Independence
- Mathias Bæk Tejs Knudsen,
- Morten Stöckel
- University of Copenhagen,
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewHost publication Subtitle
23rd Annual European Symposium, Patras, Greece, September 14–16, 2015, ProceedingsOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 828-839Publication milestones
- Published - 2015
Publication status
Published - 2015
Volume
9294Publisher
Springer, United States, GermanyBook series
- Book series name: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
ISSN: 0302-9743
ISBN (Print)
978-3-662-48349-7ISBN (Electronic)
978-3-662-48350-3Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84945531602
Host publication title
Algorithms – ESA 2015Abstract
Randomized algorithms and data structures are often analyzed under the assumption of access to a perfect source of randomness. The most fundamental metric used to measure how “random” a hash function or a random number generator is, is its independence: a sequence of random variables is said to be k-independent if every variable is uniform and every size k subset is independent.
In this paper we consider three classic algorithms under limited independence. Besides the theoretical interest in removing the unrealistic assumption of full independence, the work is motivated by lower independence being more practical. We provide new bounds for randomized quicksort, min-wise hashing and largest bucket size under limited independence. Our results can be summarized as follows.
Randomized Quicksort. When pivot elements are computed using a 5-independent hash function, Karloff and Raghavan, J.ACM’93 showed O(nlogn) expected worst-case running time for a special version of quicksort. We improve upon this, showing that the same running time is achieved with only 4-independence.
Min-Wise Hashing. For a set A, consider the probability of a particular element being mapped to the smallest hash value. It is known that 5-independence implies the optimal probability O(1/n). Broder et al., STOC’98 showed that 2-independence implies it is O(1/|A|−−−√). We show a matching lower bound as well as new tight bounds for 3- and 4-independent hash functions.
Largest Bucket. We consider the case where n balls are distributed to n buckets using a k-independent hash function and analyze the largest bucket size. Alon et. al, STOC’97 showed that there exists a 2-independent hash function implying a bucket of size Ω( n1/2). We generalize the bound, providing a k-independent family of functions that imply size Ω( n1/k).
In this paper we consider three classic algorithms under limited independence. Besides the theoretical interest in removing the unrealistic assumption of full independence, the work is motivated by lower independence being more practical. We provide new bounds for randomized quicksort, min-wise hashing and largest bucket size under limited independence. Our results can be summarized as follows.
Randomized Quicksort. When pivot elements are computed using a 5-independent hash function, Karloff and Raghavan, J.ACM’93 showed O(nlogn) expected worst-case running time for a special version of quicksort. We improve upon this, showing that the same running time is achieved with only 4-independence.
Min-Wise Hashing. For a set A, consider the probability of a particular element being mapped to the smallest hash value. It is known that 5-independence implies the optimal probability O(1/n). Broder et al., STOC’98 showed that 2-independence implies it is O(1/|A|−−−√). We show a matching lower bound as well as new tight bounds for 3- and 4-independent hash functions.
Largest Bucket. We consider the case where n balls are distributed to n buckets using a k-independent hash function and analyze the largest bucket size. Alon et. al, STOC’97 showed that there exists a 2-independent hash function implying a bucket of size Ω( n1/2). We generalize the bound, providing a k-independent family of functions that imply size Ω( n1/k).
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
3
Captures
2
Access to documents
Accepted author manuscript, 575.88 KB
Accepted author manuscript
