Multistakeholder and Multimethod Evaluation
- Robin Burke,
- Gediminas Adomavicius,
- ,
- Tomasso Di Noia,
- Dominik Kowald,
- Julia Neidhardt
- University of Colorado,
- University of Minnesota,
- ,
- ,
- Polytechnic University of Bari,
- Know-Center Graz
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Report chapter
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Report chapter
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 123-145Publication milestones
- Published - 26/11/2024
Publication status
Published - 26/11/2024
Place of publication
DagstuhlEdition
5Volume
14Publisher
Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik GmbHBook series
- Book series name: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings
Series number: 5
Volume: 14
ISSN: 1862-4405
Host publication title
Evaluation Perspectives of Recommender Systems: Driving Research and Education (Dagstuhl Seminar 24211)Abstract
Multistakeholder recommender systems are defined by [1] as those that account for “the preferences of multiple parties when generating recommendations, especially when these parties are on different sides of the recommendation interaction.” Due to their complexity, evaluating these systems cannot be restricted to the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications.
In this section, we focus our discussion on the intricacies involved in understanding what is the “right” construct required to ensure the proper evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved in the evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems – from the range of stakeholders involved (beyond producers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. Additionally, we discuss how to move from theoretical evaluation to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. Our aim in this section is to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about how to think about these complex and domain-dependent issues in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
In this section, we focus our discussion on the intricacies involved in understanding what is the “right” construct required to ensure the proper evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved in the evaluation of multistakeholder recommender systems – from the range of stakeholders involved (beyond producers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. Additionally, we discuss how to move from theoretical evaluation to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. Our aim in this section is to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about how to think about these complex and domain-dependent issues in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
Access to documents
Final published version
License:CC BY, opens in new tab
