Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Mood instability in bipolar disorder type I versus type II-continuous daily electronic self-monitoring of illness activity using smartphones

  • Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
    ,
  • Christian Ritz
    ,
  • Mads Frost
    ,
  • Rie Lambæk Mikkelsen
    ,
  • Ellen Margrethe Christensen
    ,
  • Jakob Bardram
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 342-349 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Affective Disorders (Volume 186)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2015

Publication status

Published - 2015

ISSN

0165-0327

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84939194655

Abstract

Background

A substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder remain symptomatic during inter-episode periods, and mood instability is associated with high risk of relapse and hospitalization. Few studies have investigated long-term daily illness activity and none has compared bipolar type I and II using daily data. The objectives were to investigate differences in daily illness activity between bipolar disorder type I and II.

Methods

A smartphone-based system for self-monitoring was developed. A total of 33 patients treated in a mood clinic used the system for daily self-monitoring during a median period of 310 days [IQR 189; 437]. Data presented summarize over 8500 observations.

Results

Patients with bipolar disorder type II (n=20), compared to patients with bipolar disorder type I (n=13), experienced a significant lower mean level of mood on a scale from −3; +3 (−0.54 (95% CI: −0.74; −0.35) versus −0.19 (95% CI: −0.35; −0.02), p=0.02), less time euthymic (51.0% (95% CI: 36.4; 65.7) versus 74.5% (95% CI: 62.4; 86.7), p=0.03) and a higher proportion of time with depressive symptoms (45.1% (95% CI: 30.6; 59.5) versus 18.8% (95% CI: 6.9; 30.7), p=0.01). The proportion of time spent with (hypo)manic symptoms did not differ (2.7% (95% CI: 0.1; 5.5) versus 5.5% (95% CI: 3.1; 7.8), p=0.17).
Limitations

Patients received different types, doses and combinations of psychopharmacological treatment.

Conclusion

Euthymia was obtained for a substantial proportion of time in patients with bipolar disorder type I, but despite on-going treatment only for half of the time for patients with bipolar disorder type II. This emphasizes the need for improving treatment strategies for bipolar disorder type II.

Keywords
Bipolar disorderMood instabilitySummary indexes on illness activityDaily electronic self-monitoringSmartphone

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
64
Captures
146
Social media
18