Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

IT‐enabled idea competitions for organizational innovation: An inquiry into breakdowns in adaptation

  • Roskilde University
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 436 (449 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Creativity and Innovation Management (Volume 28, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 18/12/2019

Publication status

Published - 18/12/2019

ISSN

0963-1690

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85076584786

Abstract

Idea competitions can help organizations innovate and IT support can make it easier to enrol participants, facilitate collaboration and manage the process. Thus far, the literature on IT‐enabled idea competitions has focused mainly on engaging external actors; consequently, we know less about the internal engagement of employees. Moreover, although the literature reveals several challenges in managing internal IT‐enabled idea competitions, there are no comprehensive empirical accounts of how these challenges manifest in organizational contexts. Against this backdrop, we investigate how an engineering consultancy adapted an IT‐enabled idea competition to support innovation, innovation awareness and knowledge sharing. This descriptive case study provides a detailed analysis of the breakdowns that manifested, what triggered the breakdowns, and how the organization responded. Our analysis reveals that the system required substantial adaptation, and, although it addressed well‐known challenges in managing idea competitions, other challenges surfaced. We combine these empirical insights with extant literature to propose a model for understanding and explaining how our case organization handled the breakdowns that occurred while implementing the idea competition system.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Usage
115
Captures
43
Citations
5