Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Introducing listening as a weak method for advancing sustainability and interdisciplinary scholarship

  • Artur Branny
    ,
  • ,
  • Erik Andersson
    ,
  • Timon McPhearson
    ,
  • Christopher M. Raymond
    ,
  • Maija Faehnle
  • Stockholm University
    ,
  • University of Copenhagen
    ,
  • University of Helsinki
    ,
  • Finnish Environmental Institute (Syke)
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 77–94

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Sustainability Science (Volume 20)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 24/10/2024

Publication status

Published - 24/10/2024

Publication IDs

  • ORCID: /0000-0003-4998-4883/work/179142528
  • Scopus: 85207351880

Abstract

There is now widespread recognition of the need for inter/transdisciplinary (I/TD) approaches to solving global problems like climate change and biodiversity. Yet methods for successfully integrating knowledge across disciplines, and between research and practice, are in need of further development, particularly approaches that can ameliorate epistemological and ontological divides. Here we propose a framework for good listening as a ‘weak method’ that can provide guidance and structure to I/TD collaborations, but does not assume the form and goals a given collaboration will take. Synthesising the results of a scoping, interdisciplinary literature review, we highlight four key components of listening—receiving, processing, interpretation, and feedback/response—and provide a set of normative values regarding ‘good listening’ for each. Our goal is to provide a framework that is grounded in detailed scholarly discussions of listening politics and practice, but that is specifically formulated in response to the needs and concerns of I/TD researchers. We then apply our framework to four commonly encountered challenges in sustainability science, drawing on our collective experience in the field to explore how good listening can aid I/TD collaboration in regards to inclusion, group dynamics, format and pace. In doing so, we hope to inspire those working in sustainability science to approach I/TD collaboration in a new way and provide a tool for facilitating caring and transformational approaches to solving the world’s most pressing sustainability crises.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
5
Mentions
1
Captures
24