Interaction with the dirty, dangerous, and dull
- Clint Heyer,
- Kristoffer Husøy
- ABB
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Editorial
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Editorial
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 19-23 (5 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
interactions (Volume 19, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 07/2012
Publication status
Published - 07/2012
ISSN
1072-5520Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84864064753
Abstract
The environments for which interaction designers design tend to be rather benign: the office, the home. The settings are familiar to us, identifiable and relatable, often places we’ve experienced firsthand. A host of assumptions are implicit in these settings that affect the style of design inquiry and the forms of prototyping and evaluation. For example, we might assume a stable and safe physical environment, or that if something doesn’t work, it is an annoyance rather than a life-or-death situation.
In our work, we have explored quite a different context: that of an oil and gas facility, where work is at times dirty, dangerous, and dull. We describe how we approached design for this unfamiliar environment and outline some of our concepts. In our general program of research, we are exploring new, yet “close to market” artifacts and systems for use in oil and gas, potentially for productization.
In our work, we have explored quite a different context: that of an oil and gas facility, where work is at times dirty, dangerous, and dull. We describe how we approached design for this unfamiliar environment and outline some of our concepts. In our general program of research, we are exploring new, yet “close to market” artifacts and systems for use in oil and gas, potentially for productization.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
4
Captures
14
Access to documents
Submitted manuscript, 23.71 MB
