Individual differences in replicated multi-product experiments with Thurstonian mixed models for binary paired comparison data
- Christine Borgen Linander(corresponding author),
- Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen,
- Graham Cleaver,
- Technical University of Denmark,
- Copenhagen University Hospital,
- Christensen Statistics,
- Unilever
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 220-229Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Food Quality and Preference (Volume 75)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/07/2019
Publication status
Published - 01/07/2019
ISSN
0950-3293Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85063357516
- ORCID: /0000-0002-1432-7229/work/56235599
- ORCID: /0000-0002-4494-3399/work/56236535
Abstract
Often sensory discrimination tests are performed with replications for the assessors. In this paper, we suggest a new way of analyzing data from a discrimination study. The model suggested in this paper is a Thurstonian mixed model, in which the variation from the assessors is modelled as a random effect in a generalized linear mixed model. The setting is a multi-product discrimination study with a binary paired comparison. This model makes it possible to embed the analyses of products into one analysis rather than having to do an analysis for each product separately. In addition, it is possible to embed the model into the Thurstonian framework obtaining d-prime interpretations of the estimates. Furthermore, it is possible to extract information about the assessors, even across the products. More specifically, assessor specific d-prime estimates are obtained providing a way to get information about the panel. These estimates are interesting because they make it possible to investigate if the assessors are assessing in a specific way.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
14
Citations
6
Access to documents
Accepted author manuscript, 743.36 KB
