Inaction as a Design Decision: Reflections on Not Designing Self-Tracking Tools for Menopause
- Sarah Homewood
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages alt17Publication milestones
- Published - 18/04/2019
Publication status
Published - 18/04/2019
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery, United StatesISBN (Electronic)
978-1-4503-5971-9Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85067289108
Host publication title
Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAbstract
This reflective essay documents an attempt to design self-tracking technologies for menopause. This process culminated in the decision to not design. The contribution of this essay is the knowledge produced through reflecting on inaction. From an investigation into current examples, it became clear that applying self-tracking to menopause was fundamentally inappropriate. These technologies were also found to risk resulting in more harm than good; both in essentializing and medicalizing a non-medical process, and in perpetuating notions of the bodily experience of the menopausal transition as a negative experience.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
57
Captures
49
Access to documents
Submitted manuscript, 228.3 KB
