How Creative Practitioners Use Tools to Capture Ideas: A Cross-Domain Study
- Emilia Rosselli Del Turco,
- ,
- James D. Hollan,
- Peter Dalsgaard
- Aarhus University,
- University of California,
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishArticle number
40Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1-38 (38 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (Volume 32, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 31/08/2025
Publication status
Published - 31/08/2025
ISSN
1073-0516Publication IDs
- ORCID: /0000-0002-5375-9542/work/182637474
- Scopus: 105018584895
Abstract
Creative practitioners rely on tools to capture and manage ideas as a foundational aspect of their work. However, we have little knowledge about how idea management practices vary in different creative domains. Combining insights from qualitative surveys (N 200) and follow-up in-depth interviews (n
60) with creative professionals from four domains (interaction design, research, music, and graphics) of creative work, we report on (1) how ideas are externalized in practitioners’ archives, (2) what they consider important when choosing tools to capture ideas, and (3) how these tool collections resemble and differ from each other. Our cross-domain study demonstrates that participants’ tool use reflects idea capture characteristic needs as well as domain-specific views about the creative process. We conclude with a discussion about capturing as an externalizing activity, practitioners’ use of the term ideas, and four suggestions for directions in the design of creativity support tools.
60) with creative professionals from four domains (interaction design, research, music, and graphics) of creative work, we report on (1) how ideas are externalized in practitioners’ archives, (2) what they consider important when choosing tools to capture ideas, and (3) how these tool collections resemble and differ from each other. Our cross-domain study demonstrates that participants’ tool use reflects idea capture characteristic needs as well as domain-specific views about the creative process. We conclude with a discussion about capturing as an externalizing activity, practitioners’ use of the term ideas, and four suggestions for directions in the design of creativity support tools.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
11
Citations
4
