From Masked Language Modeling to Translation: Non-English Auxiliary Tasks Improve Zero-shot Spoken Language Understanding
- ,
- Ibrahim Sharaf,
- Aizhan Imankulova,
- Ahmet Üstün,
- Marija Stepanovic,
- Alan Ramponi
- ,
- ,
- Factmata,
- Tokyo Metropolitan University,
- University of Groningen,
- University of Trento
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPublication milestones
- Published - 2021
Publication status
Published - 2021
Publisher
Association for Computational Linguistics, United StatesHost publication title
Proceedings of NAACLAbstract
The lack of publicly available evaluation data for low-resource languages limits progress in Spoken Language Understanding (SLU). As key tasks like intent classification and slot filling require abundant training data, it is desirable to reuse existing data in high-resource languages to develop models for low-resource scenarios. We introduce XSID, a new benchmark for cross-lingual (X) Slot and Intent Detection in 13 languages from 6 language families, including a very low-resource dialect.
To tackle the challenge, we propose a joint learning approach, with English SLU training data and non-English auxiliary tasks from raw text, syntax and translation for transfer. We study two setups which differ by type and language coverage of the pre-trained embeddings. Our results show that jointly learning the main
tasks with masked language modeling is effective for slots, while machine translation works best for intent classification.
To tackle the challenge, we propose a joint learning approach, with English SLU training data and non-English auxiliary tasks from raw text, syntax and translation for transfer. We study two setups which differ by type and language coverage of the pre-trained embeddings. Our results show that jointly learning the main
tasks with masked language modeling is effective for slots, while machine translation works best for intent classification.
Access to documents
Accepted author manuscript, 402.81 KB
Accepted author manuscript, 548.65 KB
Related Event
Title
Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
Event type
ConferenceDate
06/06/2021 - 11/06/2021Location
VIRTUAL
