Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons

  • Sophie Birot
    ,
  • Amélie Crépet
    ,
  • Benjamin C. Remington
    ,
  • Charlotte Bernhard Madsen(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Astrid G. Kruizinga
    ,
  • Joseph L. Baumert
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Technical University of Denmark
    ,
  • French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety
    ,
  • The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research
    ,
  • University of Nebraska
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

18206

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Scientific Reports (Volume 9, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2019

Publication status

Published - 2019

ISSN

2045-2322

Publication IDs

  • ORCID: /0000-0002-1432-7229/work/65845363
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-9086-7120/work/65845788
  • PubMed: 31796875
  • Scopus: 85075917724

Abstract

Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
5
Captures
14

Access to documents