Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Flavour development in pork. Influence of flavour precursor concentrations in longissimus dorsi from pigs with different raw meat qualities

  • Lene Meinert
    ,
  • Kaja Tikk
    ,
  • Meelis Tikk
    ,
  • ,
  • Wender L. P. Bredie
    ,
  • Charlotte Bjergegaard
  • Danish Meat Research Institute
    ,
  • Aarhus University
    ,
  • Technical University of Denmark
    ,
  • University of Copenhagen
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 255-262

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Meat Science (Volume 81, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2009

Publication status

Published - 2009

ISSN

0309-1740

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 53449101954
  • PubMed: 22063992
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-1432-7229/work/40611422

Abstract

Flavour development and overall eating quality of pan-fried pork chops of longissimus dorsi from eight different raw meat qualities aged for 4 and IS days were assessed by a trained sensory panel. The raw meat qualities were obtained through combinations of strategic feeding/fasting (control vs. low glycogen concentration), slaughter live-weight (84 kg vs. 110 kg), and gender (female vs. castrate). The flavour development was investigated for possible correlation with the concentrations of selected individual flavour precursors present in the raw meat: rnonosaccharides, IMP and degradation products, fatty acids, lactate and thiamine. Differences in precursor concentrations between the raw Meat qualities were observed with feeding/fasting and ageing as the main factors with the largest influence of all experimental factors. However, the concentrations of the precursors could not explain the differences in sensory perception of the pan-fried pork chops. Overall, the differences were small.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
39
Captures
52