Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice

  • Andrea Capaccioli
    ,
  • Giacomo Poderi
    ,
  • Mela Bettega
    ,
  • Vincenzo D'Andrea
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 621-630 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Energy Policy (Volume 107)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/2017

Publication status

Published - 08/2017

ISSN

0301-4215

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85016607351

Abstract

The ethical and sustainable production and consumption of energy are becoming increasingly important with the ongoing transformation and decentralization of the energy system. For other kinds of goods and commodities ethical consumption have direct implications for, and the participation of, informed citizens. Due to its intangibility, energy lacks the same levels of reflection and intervention by citizens and those aspects are yet to be fully explored in practice. This paper contributes to the understanding of how energy justice might be approached. We reflect on an empirical experience of participatory energy budgeting, a process aimed at determining how to redistribute a share of energy linked to collective virtuous consumption behaviors. We analyze through a qualitative thematic analysis how participants make sense of the participatory energy budgeting process and the emerged dynamics within the local communities and how this process can strive to reconfigure the relationship among civil society, the energy sector and politics, in order to remediate injustices. We highlight how the construction-in-practice of energy justice in a local community might be closely linked to issues such as the form of energy governance that allows for the participation of citizens and the accountability of the process, policies and technological limitations.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
151
Citations
33