Exploring Deep Learning Models for EEG Neural Decoding
- Laurits Dixen,
- ,
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Book chapter
Peer-reviewPublication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Book chapter
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 162-175 (14 pages)Publication milestones
- Accepted/In press - 2024
- Published - 2025
Publication status
Published - 2025
Publisher
Springer, United States, GermanyBook series
- Book series name: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
ISSN: 0302-9743
ISBN (Print)
9783031824869Publication IDs
- Scopus: 105000980847
Host publication title
International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and NeuroscienceAbstract
Neural decoding is an important method in cognitive neuroscience that aims to decode brain representations from recorded neural
activity using a multivariate machine learning model. The THINGS initiative provides a large EEG dataset of 46 subjects watching rapidly
shown images. Here, we test the feasibility of using this method for decoding high-level object features using recent deep learning models. We create a derivative dataset from this of living vs non-living entities test 15 different deep learning models with 5 different architectures and compare to a SOTA linear model. We show that the linear model is not able to solve the decoding task, while almost all the deep learning models are successful, suggesting that in some cases non-linear models are needed to decode neural representations. We also run a comparative study of the models’ performance on individual object categories, and suggest how
artificial neural networks can be used to study brain activity.
activity using a multivariate machine learning model. The THINGS initiative provides a large EEG dataset of 46 subjects watching rapidly
shown images. Here, we test the feasibility of using this method for decoding high-level object features using recent deep learning models. We create a derivative dataset from this of living vs non-living entities test 15 different deep learning models with 5 different architectures and compare to a SOTA linear model. We show that the linear model is not able to solve the decoding task, while almost all the deep learning models are successful, suggesting that in some cases non-linear models are needed to decode neural representations. We also run a comparative study of the models’ performance on individual object categories, and suggest how
artificial neural networks can be used to study brain activity.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
1
Captures
8
