Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Epic, Steam, and the role of skin-betting in game (platform) economies

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 52 (67 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Consumer Culture (Volume 21, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/02/2021

Publication status

Published - 01/02/2021

ISSN

1469-5405

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85102432289

Abstract

In this article, we discuss how and why virtual items known as “skins” travel beyond games and into wider online ecosystems where they become tokens in gambling games. We argue that betting with skins purchased on the Steam platform contributes to the wider platform economy. We do this on the basis of a comparative analysis of Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and Fortnite: Battle Royale as well as the two platforms on which these games exist. First, we discuss the notion of platform economies in relation to the two cases in question and how this positions the consumer as “prosumer” and “micro-entrepreneur.” Second, we introduce our analytical framework related to game economies and skins as commodities and currencies. On the basis of this, we compare the ways skins are acquired in the two games and the degree to which they extend exist beyond the game. We argue that Epic retains a “skin-monopoly,” within the game, whereas Steam features a free “skin market” that transgresses the platform and turns the “prosumer” into a “micro-entrepreneur” and the “modder” into a “speculator.”

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
126
Citations
46