Don't predict if you cannot interpret: investigating the clinical viability of facial movements for machine-learning assisted diagnostics of bipolar disorder
- ,
- ,
- Lars Vedel Kessing,
- Hanne Lie Kjærstad,
- Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak,
- ,
- ,
- ,
- University of Copenhagen,
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC)
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 198-207 (10 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (Volume 80, Issue 3)Publication milestones
- Submitted - 30/03/2026
- Published - 30/03/2026
Publication status
Published - 30/03/2026
Publication IDs
- ORCID: /0000-0002-6791-7425/work/215028295
- WOS: 001728777300001
- Scopus: 105034553424
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have explored the possibility of developing automatic detection pipelines that can seamlessly diagnose patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and other mental illnesses. Such novel diagnostic tools increasingly rely on data sources, such as facial movements, whose relationships to BD have yet to be fully elucidated. As such, these detection pipelines offer limited clinical value, despite promising performance estimates. A vital next step toward achieving clinically reliable models is to conduct granular interpretability analyses to determine which subsets of facial movements are responsible for determining patient or control class membership. Materials and Methods: In this work, we rely on facial movements encoded as Action Units (AUs) of 32 participants recorded while watching emotional film clips. Our objective is to delineate the specific facial micro-movements responsible for the differences between patients with BD and controls by applying the interpretable Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) in a binary, supervised classification design. Results: We report how the movement of brow lowering (AU4) differentiates patients from controls with AUROC scores up to 69%. Conclusions: Our exploratory study argues for the necessity of devising inherently interpretable machine learning models for the clinical domain. Furthermore, we critically discuss the implications of identifying AU4 as a key discriminative feature and assess the clinical value of specific facial movements for the diagnostic process.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
1
Funding Details
This project was partially funded by the Pioneer Centre for AI, DNRF grant number P1.
