Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out
- Bertie Vidgen,
- The Alan Turing Institute,
- ,
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishArticle number
e0243300Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
PLOS ONE (Volume 15, Issue 12)Publication milestones
- Published - 28/12/2020
Publication status
Published - 28/12/2020
ISSN
1932-6203Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85098917139
Abstract
Data-driven and machine learning based approaches for detecting, categorising and measuring abusive content such as hate speech and harassment have gained traction due to their scalability, robustness and increasingly high performance. Making effective detection systems for abusive content relies on having the right training datasets, reflecting a widely accepted mantra in computer science: Garbage In, Garbage Out. However, creating training datasets which are large, varied, theoretically-informed and that minimize biases is difficult, laborious and requires deep expertise. This paper systematically reviews 63 publicly available training datasets which have been created to train abusive language classifiers. It also reports on creation of a dedicated website for cataloguing abusive language data hatespeechdata.com. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of open science in this field, and argue that although more dataset sharing would bring many benefits it also poses social and ethical risks which need careful consideration. Finally, we provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners creating new abusive content training datasets.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Social media
13
Citations
303
Captures
301
Access to documents
Final published version, 477.94 KB
License:CC BY, opens in new tab
