Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Digital Mistrust: Ethnographic Encounters with Computational Forms

  • University of Copenhagen
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 725–736 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Cultural Economy (Volume 17, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 15/11/2024

Publication status

Published - 15/11/2024

ISSN

1753-0350

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85209661901

Abstract

This special issue is driven by a curiosity about the role of computational forms – practices, logics, technologies, and infrastructures – in social life and how they mediate issues of trust and mistrust: designated (mis)trust. Through a series of ethnographic encounters, its contributors describe how (mis)trust is rendered as an issue of concern by various actors as it is problematized, conceptualized, narrated, and designed for. In doing so, the papers analyse the work (mis)trust does in these settings, with a focus on the role of computational thinking within public discourses on democratic elections, the use of computational technologies in establishing bureaucratic order, the computational practices at play in the production of coding subjectivities, and the computational artefacts that assure data circulations within digital infrastructures. This introduction argues for a more expansive understanding of the relation between trust and mistrust in the digital age, countering the oftentimes default rendering of these concepts as antonymic. Instead, it argues that they live in a mutable relation. Despite prevailing technosolutionist approaches to (mis)trust, it cannot, we suggest, be solved for, resolved, or even eviscerated. Whatever actors (engineers, programmers, professionals etc) do in their efforts to ‘fix’ mistrust, it continues to mutate as a social form.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
4
Captures
21