Designing a Risk Assessment Tool for Artificial Intelligence Systems
- Per Rådberg Nagbøl,
- ,
- Oliver Müller
- Paderborn University
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Book chapter
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Book chapter
Peer-reviewHost publication Subtitle
16th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST 2021, Kristiansand, Norway, August 4–6, 2021, ProceedingsOriginal language
DanishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 328-339 (12 pages)Publication milestones
- Published - 27/07/2021
Publication status
Published - 27/07/2021
Place of publication
Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, SwitzerlandPublisher
Springer, United States, GermanyISBN (Print)
978-3-030-82404-4ISBN (Electronic)
978-3-030-82405-1Chapter Number
DSR and GovernancePublication IDs
- Scopus: 85113486190
Host publication title
The Next Wave of Sociotechnical DesignAbstract
Notwithstanding its potential benefits, organizational AI use can lead to unintended consequences like opaque decision-making processes or biased decisions. Hence, a key challenge for organizations these days is to implement procedures that can be used to assess and mitigate the risks of organizational AI use. Although public awareness of AI-related risks is growing, the extant literature provides limited guidance to organizations on how to assess and manage AI risks. Against this background, we conducted an Action Design Research project in collaboration with a government agency with a pioneering AI practice to iteratively build, implement, and evaluate the Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment (AIRA) tool. Besides the theory-ingrained and empirically evaluated AIRA tool, our key contribution is a set of five design principles for instantiating further instances of this class of artifacts. In comparison to existing AI risk assessment tools, our work emphasizes communication between stakeholders of diverse expertise, estimating the expected real-world positive and negative consequences of AI use, and incorporating performance metrics beyond predictive accuracy, including thus assessments of privacy, fairness, and interpretability.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
18
Captures
43
