Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Deceptive Pattern Analysis in Education Technology: Examining Manipulative and Ethical Design Practices in EdTech Platforms

  • University of Bristol
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Host publication Subtitle

Companion Publication of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 427-432 (6 pages)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/07/2025

Publication status

Published - 05/07/2025

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery, United States

ISBN (Electronic)

979-8-4007-1486-3

Publication IDs

  • ORCID: /0000-0002-8772-2959/work/187331006
  • Scopus: 105012189093

Host publication title

DIS '25 Companion

Host publication editors

  • Nuno Nunes
  • Valentina Nisi
  • Ian Oakley
  • Clement Zheng
  • Qian Yang

Abstract

As Educational Technology (EdTech) platforms become increasingly integrated into higher education, concerns arise regarding the use of deceptive patterns—manipulative UX/UI strategies that influence user decisions. This study systematically examines deceptive patterns across Learning Management Systems (LMS), Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), new media platforms, and AI-driven learning tools. Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a survey with 12 university students and 6 educators to analyze their experiences and awareness of deceptive practices.

Findings reveal that LMS platforms are trusted but lack flexibility, MOOCs often employ deceptive pricing strategies, new media platforms leverage algorithm-driven engagement tactics, and AI tools raise concerns about academic integrity. These insights highlight the tension between personalization and user protection, emphasizing the need for transparent and ethical EdTech design. This study contributes to UX regulation discussions and provides recommendations for balancing user engagement, accessibility, and fairness in digital learning environments.

Publication metrics