Deceptive Pattern Analysis in Education Technology: Examining Manipulative and Ethical Design Practices in EdTech Platforms
- Muyuan Liu,
- ,
- Anne Roudaut
- University of Bristol
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewHost publication Subtitle
Companion Publication of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 427-432 (6 pages)Publication milestones
- Published - 05/07/2025
Publication status
Published - 05/07/2025
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery, United StatesISBN (Electronic)
979-8-4007-1486-3Publication IDs
- ORCID: /0000-0002-8772-2959/work/187331006
- Scopus: 105012189093
Host publication title
DIS '25 CompanionHost publication editors
- Nuno Nunes
- Valentina Nisi
- Ian Oakley
- Clement Zheng
- Qian Yang
Abstract
As Educational Technology (EdTech) platforms become increasingly integrated into higher education, concerns arise regarding the use of deceptive patterns—manipulative UX/UI strategies that influence user decisions. This study systematically examines deceptive patterns across Learning Management Systems (LMS), Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), new media platforms, and AI-driven learning tools. Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a survey with 12 university students and 6 educators to analyze their experiences and awareness of deceptive practices.
Findings reveal that LMS platforms are trusted but lack flexibility, MOOCs often employ deceptive pricing strategies, new media platforms leverage algorithm-driven engagement tactics, and AI tools raise concerns about academic integrity. These insights highlight the tension between personalization and user protection, emphasizing the need for transparent and ethical EdTech design. This study contributes to UX regulation discussions and provides recommendations for balancing user engagement, accessibility, and fairness in digital learning environments.
Findings reveal that LMS platforms are trusted but lack flexibility, MOOCs often employ deceptive pricing strategies, new media platforms leverage algorithm-driven engagement tactics, and AI tools raise concerns about academic integrity. These insights highlight the tension between personalization and user protection, emphasizing the need for transparent and ethical EdTech design. This study contributes to UX regulation discussions and provides recommendations for balancing user engagement, accessibility, and fairness in digital learning environments.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
21
