Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Critical chemsex studies: Interrogating cultures of sexualized drug use beyond the risk paradigm

  • Kristian Møller
    ,
  • Jamie Hakim
  • King’s College London
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1-9 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Sexualities

Publication milestones

  • Published - 20/12/2021

Publication status

Published - 20/12/2021

ISSN

1363-4607

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85108321169

Abstract

This article proposes and outlines a critical approach to the study of chemsex. The vast majority of chemsex research takes place within the broad field of health, particularly LGBTQ+ health, which ultimately frames such work using a paradigm of risk. This article follows previous research that calls attention to the limitations of this perspective, and suggests the value in formalising more generative, explorative and critical approaches to the phenomenon. Based on this previous scholarship and the contributions to the special issue, we propose that ‘critical chemsex studies’ operates along three axes: one working
within public health that attempts to move beyond the risk paradigm; another which attempts to understand its cultural dimensions as it interrogates the discursive, socio-political, technological and economic landscapes in which chemsex has materialised, and finally; a third centering pleasure and its organisation of gay identity, intimacy, and sociability. Finally, we look to the future of critical chemsex studies, calling for more diverse works on national and regional differences in chemsex culture, as well as how the framework can be adapted in order to leverage its capacities for the women, trans and non-binary people who are under-represented in the current literature.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
66
Captures
58
Social media
17
Mentions
3