Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Concurrency & Asynchrony in Declarative Workflows

Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Host publication Subtitle

Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2015)

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 72-89

Publication milestones

  • Published - 31/08/2015

Publication status

Published - 31/08/2015

Volume

9253

Publisher

Springer, United States, Germany

Book series

  • Book series name: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
    ISSN: 0302-9743
978-3319230627

ISBN (Electronic)

978-3319230627

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84944679867

Host publication title

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Declarative or constraint-based business process and workflow notations have received increasing interest in the last decade as possible means of addressing the challenge of supporting at the same time flexibility in execution, adaptability and compliance. However, the definition of concurrent semantics, which is a necessary foundation for asynchronously executing distributed processes, is not obvious for declarative formalisms and is so far virtually unexplored. This is in stark contrast to the very successful Petri-net–based process languages, which have an inherent notion of concurrency. In this paper, we pro- pose a notion of concurrency for declarative process models, formulated in the context of Dynamic Condition Response (DCR) graphs, and exploiting the so-called “true concurrency” semantics of Labelled Asynchronous Transition Systems. We demonstrate how this semantic underpinning of concurrency in DCR Graphs admits asynchronous execution of declarative workflows both conceptually and by reporting on a prototype implementation of a distributed declarative workflow engine. Both the theoretical development and the implementation is supported by an extended example; moreover, the theoretical development has been verified correct in the Isabelle-HOL interactive theorem prover.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
14
Citations
18