Concurrency & Asynchrony in Declarative Workflows
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewHost publication Subtitle
Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2015)Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 72-89Publication milestones
- Published - 31/08/2015
Publication status
Published - 31/08/2015
Volume
9253Publisher
Springer, United States, GermanyBook series
- Book series name: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
ISSN: 0302-9743
ISBN (Print)
978-3319230627ISBN (Electronic)
978-3319230627Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84944679867
Host publication title
Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceAbstract
Declarative or constraint-based business process and workflow notations have received increasing interest in the last decade as possible means of addressing the challenge of supporting at the same time flexibility in execution, adaptability and compliance. However, the definition of concurrent semantics, which is a necessary foundation for asynchronously executing distributed processes, is not obvious for declarative formalisms and is so far virtually unexplored. This is in stark contrast to the very successful Petri-net–based process languages, which have an inherent notion of concurrency. In this paper, we pro- pose a notion of concurrency for declarative process models, formulated in the context of Dynamic Condition Response (DCR) graphs, and exploiting the so-called “true concurrency” semantics of Labelled Asynchronous Transition Systems. We demonstrate how this semantic underpinning of concurrency in DCR Graphs admits asynchronous execution of declarative workflows both conceptually and by reporting on a prototype implementation of a distributed declarative workflow engine. Both the theoretical development and the implementation is supported by an extended example; moreover, the theoretical development has been verified correct in the Isabelle-HOL interactive theorem prover.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
14
Citations
18
Access to documents
Submitted manuscript, 261.61 KB
Accepted author manuscript, 827.6 KB
