Concordance: A Critical Participatory Alternative in Healthcare IT
- ,
- Nervo Verdezoto,
- Naveen L. Bagalkot,
- Tomas Sokoler
- Aarhus University,
- Srishti Manipal Institute of Art, Design and Technology
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewPublication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewHost publication Subtitle
5TH DECENNIAL AARHUS CONFERENCEOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 21-25 (4 pages)Publication milestones
- Published - 17/08/2015
Publication status
Published - 17/08/2015
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery, United StatesPublication IDs
- Scopus: 85062375593
Host publication title
CRITICAL ALTERNATIVES 2015Host publication editors
- Shaowen Bardzell
- Susanne Bødker
- Ole Sejer Iversen
- Clemens N. Klokmose
- Henrik Korsgaard
Abstract
The healthcare sector is undergoing large changes with technology taking on a larger role in both in-clinic consultations and out-of-clinic care. As the provision of care moves out of the hospitals and into people’s everyday lives the authoritative models of compliance and adherence and their hierarchical definitions of the patient-healthcare professional relationship are being challenged and other, more democratic and collaborative models emerging. Concordance is a model that favours an equal patient-doctor relationship and negotiation of care regimens. This article will identify critical alternatives to how care and healthcare IT may be designed based on best practice from both the medical and design research fields. In particular, this paper proposes ongoing design processes in which both care and healthcare IT are jointly designed in a concordance-influenced collaboration over time.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
16
Citations
7
