Beyond the Spreadsheet: Reflections on Tool Support for Literature Studies
- ,
- Jacob Benjamin Cholewa,
- Peter Nellemann,
- Marco Kuhrmann
- ,
- University of Southern Denmark
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewPublication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishArticle number
22Publication milestones
- Published - 01/06/2016
Publication status
Published - 01/06/2016
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery, United StatesISBN (Print)
978-1-4503-3691-8Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84978484185
Host publication title
EASE '16 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software EngineeringAbstract
Background: Even though a number of tools are reported to be used by researchers undertaking systematic reviews, important shortages are still reported revealing how such solutions are unable to satisfy current needs.
Method: Two research groups independently provided a design for a tool supporting systematic reviews. The resulting tools were assessed against the feature lists provided by prior research.
Results: After presenting an overview of the tools and the core design decisions taken, we provide a feature analysis and a discussion regarding selected challenges deemed crucial to provide a proper tool support.
Conclusions: Although the designed solutions do not yet support the entire systematic review process, their architecture has been designed to be flexible and extendable. After highlighting the difficulties of developing appropriate tools, we call for action: developing tools to support systematic reviews is a community project
Method: Two research groups independently provided a design for a tool supporting systematic reviews. The resulting tools were assessed against the feature lists provided by prior research.
Results: After presenting an overview of the tools and the core design decisions taken, we provide a feature analysis and a discussion regarding selected challenges deemed crucial to provide a proper tool support.
Conclusions: Although the designed solutions do not yet support the entire systematic review process, their architecture has been designed to be flexible and extendable. After highlighting the difficulties of developing appropriate tools, we call for action: developing tools to support systematic reviews is a community project
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
28
Citations
4
Access to documents
Related Event
Title
International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
Event type
ConferenceDegree of recognition
International eventDate
01/06/2016 - 03/06/2016Location
University of Limerick and LeroLimerickIreland
