Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Autonomy Is An Acquired Taste: Exploring Developer Preferences for GitHub Bots

  • Amir Ghorbani
    ,
  • Nathan Cassee
    ,
  • Derek Robinson
    ,
  • Adam Alami
    ,
  • Neil Ernst
    ,
  • Alexander Serebrenik
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1405-1417 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (Volume 2023)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2023

Publication status

Published - 2023

ISSN

0270-5257

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85171733481

Abstract

Software bots fulfill an important role in collective software development, and their adoption by developers promises increased productivity. Past research has identified that bots that communicate too often can irritate developers, which affects the utility of the bot. However, it is not clear what other properties of human-bot collaboration affect developers' preferences, or what impact these properties might have. The main idea of this paper is to explore characteristics affecting developer preferences for interactions between humans and bots, in the context of GitHub pull requests. We carried out an exploratory sequential study with interviews and a subsequent vignette-based survey. We find developers generally prefer bots that are personable but show little autonomy, however, more experienced developers tend to prefer more autonomous bots. Based on this empirical evidence, we recommend bot developers increase configuration options for bots so that individual developers and projects can configure bots to best align with their own preferences and project cultures.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
13
Citations
16

Access to documents

Accepted author manuscript, 516.97 KB
License:Unspecified