Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Attending to Objects as Outcomes of Design Research

  • Tom Jenkins
    ,
  • Kristina Andersen
    ,
  • William Gaver
    ,
  • William Odom
    ,
  • James Pierce
    ,
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
    ,
  • STEIM
    ,
  • Goldsmiths, University of London
    ,
  • Simon Fraser University
    ,
  • Carnegie Mellon University
Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter
Article in proceedings
Peer-review

Host publication Subtitle

CHI EA '16

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 3423-3430

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/05/2016

Publication status

Published - 07/05/2016

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery, United States

Book series

  • Book series name: ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI)
978-1-4503-4082-3

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85014580893

Host publication title

Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

The goal for this workshop is to provide a venue at CHI for research through design practitioners to materially share their work with each other. Conversation will largely be centered upon a discussion of objects produced through a research through design process. Bringing together researchers as well as their physical work is a means of gaining insight into the practices and outcomes of research through design. If research through design is to continue to develop as a research practice for generating knowledge within HCI, this requires developing ways of attending to its made, material outcomes. The premise of this workshop is simple: We need additional spaces for interacting with and reflecting upon material design outcomes at CHI. The goal of this workshop is to experiment with such a space, and to initially do so without a strong theoretical or conceptual framing.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
53
Citations
16