Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Assisted design of data science pipelines

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1129-1153 (25 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

The VLDB Journal (Volume 33, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 13/02/2024

Publication status

Published - 13/02/2024

ISSN

1066-8888

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85185095712

Abstract

When designing data science (DS) pipelines, end-users can get overwhelmed by the large and growing set of available data preprocessing and modeling techniques. Intelligent discovery assistants (IDAs) and automated machine learning (AutoML) solutions aim to facilitate end-users by (semi-)automating the process. However, they are expensive to compute and yield limited applicability for a wide range of real-world use cases and application domains. This is due to (a) their need to execute thousands of pipelines to get the optimal one, (b) their limited support of DS tasks, e.g., supervised classification or regression only, and a small, static set of available data preprocessing and ML algorithms; and (c) their restriction to quantifiable evaluation processes and metrics, e.g., tenfold cross-validation using the ROC AUC score for classification. To overcome these limitations, we propose a human-in-the-loop approach for the assisted design of data science pipelines using previously executed pipelines. Based on a user query, i.e., data and a DS task, our framework outputs a ranked list of pipeline candidates from which the user can choose to execute or modify in real time. To recommend pipelines, it first identifies relevant datasets and pipelines utilizing efficient similarity search. It then ranks the candidate pipelines using multi-objective sorting and takes user interactions into account to improve suggestions over time. In our experimental evaluation, the proposed framework significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art IDA tool and achieves similar predictive performance with state-of-the-art long-running AutoML solutions while being real-time, generic to any evaluation processes and DS tasks, and extensible to new operators.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
13
Citations
7

Funding Details

This work was funded by the HEIBRiDS graduate school, with the support of the German Ministry for Education and Research as BIFOLD, BBDC 2 (01IS18025A), BZML (01IS18037A), the Software Campus Program (01IS17052), Ahold Delhaize, and the research department ’Data Science and its Applications’ of the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence. All content represents the opinion of the authors, which is not necessarily shared or endorsed by their respective employers and/or sponsors.
FundersFunding numbers
BIFOLD
01IS18025A, 01IS18037A
Ahold Delhaize
-
German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence
-