Artificial Intelligence Meets IS Researchers: Can It Replace Us?
- Claudia Loebbecke,
- Omar El Sawy,
- Atreyi Kankanhalli,
- M Lynne Markus,
- Dov Te'eni,
- Stefan Wrobel
- University of Cologne,
- National University of Singapore,
- Bentley University,
- Tel Aviv University,
- University of Bonn
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishJournal (Volume, Issue Number)
Communications of the Association for Information SystemsPublication milestones
- Published - 05/2020
Publication status
Published - 05/2020
ISSN
1529-3181Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85096985936
Abstract
In the era of accelerating digitization and rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), increasingly more job tasks may be automated by AI. However, there is little critical analysis of how this will happen, if at all, and to what kind of professions to greater or lesser extents. A few studies suggest that highly creative and knowledge-intensive tasks cannot be substituted by AI. Yet, there have been examples of creative art pieces generated by AI algorithms that even art critics could not distinguish from human-drawn paintings. As IS (and most other) researchers, we pride ourselves on the scarcity, novelty, and creativity of our work. In this context, this panel debated the critical question for IS academics-whether AI can and will replace our major activity, IS research,-or even us IS researchers.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Usage
3663
Captures
66
Citations
19
