An Anarchy of Methods: Current Trends in How Intelligence Is Abstracted in AI
- Joel Lehman,
- Jeff Clune,
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 56-62Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
I E E E Intelligent Systems (Volume 29, Issue 6)Publication milestones
- Published - 2014
Publication status
Published - 2014
ISSN
1541-1672Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84919928513
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a sprawling field encompassing a diversity of approaches to machine intelligence and disparate perspectives on how intelligence should be viewed. Because researchers often engage only within their own specialized area of AI, there are many interesting broad questions about AI as a whole that often go unanswered. How should intelligence be abstracted in AI research? Which subfields, techniques, and abstractions are most promising? Why do researchers bet their careers on the particular abstractions and techniques of their chosen subfield of AI? Should AI research be "bio-inspired" and remain faithful to the process that produced intelligence (evolution) or the biological substrate that enables it (networks of neurons)? Discussing these big-picture questions motivated us to organize an AAAI Fall Symposium, which gathered participants across AI subfields to present and debate their views. This article distills the resulting insights.
Publication metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Captures
70
Citations
8
