Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Algorithms, Interfaces, and the Circulation of Information: Interrogating the Epistemological Challenges of Facebook

  • Jannick Schou
    ,
  • Johan Farkas
Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 36-49

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry (Volume 4, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2016

Publication status

Published - 2016

ISSN

2063-7330

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85010338832

Abstract

As social and political life increasingly takes place on social network sites, new epistemological questions have emerged. How can information disseminated
through new media be understood and disentangled? How can potential hidden agendas or sources be identified? And what mechanisms govern what and how information is presented to the user? By drawing on existing research on the algorithms and interfaces underlying social network sites, this paper provides a discussion of Facebook and the epistemological challenges, potentials, and questions raised by the platform. The paper specifically discusses the ways in which interfaces shape how information can be accessed and processed by different kinds of users as well as the role of algorithms in pre-selecting what appears as representable information. A key argument of the paper is that Facebook, as a complex socio-technical network of human and non-human actors, has profound epistemological implications for how information can be accessed, understood, and circulated. In this sense, the user’s potential acquisition of information is shaped and conditioned by the technological structure of the platform. Building on these arguments, the paper suggests that new epistemological challenges deserve more scholarly attention, as they hold wide implications for both researchers and users.

Publication metrics

PlumX

Captures
48
Citations
19

Access to documents