Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A representative model and benchmark suite for the container stowage planning problem

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Journal Article or Conference Article in Journal
Journal article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

104224

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1-33

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review (Volume 201)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2025

Publication status

Published - 09/2025

ISSN

1366-5545

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105008109623

Abstract

Due to limited access to domain knowledge and domain-relevant benchmark data, the Container Stowage Planning Problem (CSPP) is notably under-researched. In particular, previous models of the CSPP have lacked two key aspects of the problem: lashing forces and paired block stowage. The former may reduce vessel capacity by up to 10%, and the latter is NP-hard. The Representative CSPP (RCSPP), which captures all critical aspects of the problem is formulated. The presented RCSPP incorporates overlooked constraints such as paired block stowage and lashing, along with an innovative method for estimating lashing forces, all while maintaining simplicity. A heuristic method, STOW, has been developed to identify solutions for the RCSPP using a specially designed benchmark suite based on real-world scenarios. STOW algorithm is an advanced search heuristic employing a diverse range of solution modification strategies, each tailored to address specific aspects of stowage optimization. Feasible solutions were successfully identified for all instances within the benchmark suite. Our initial findings emphasize the importance of accurately modeling lashing forces and employing paired block stowage. Results show that removing the lashing constraint can increase the number of containers stowed by over 7% on average, while disabling paired block stowage can result in nearly a 5% increase.

Publication metrics

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
2
Citations
1

Funding Details

This work is partially funded by the Innovation Fund Denmark (grant no. 1044-00145A).