Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A Comparison Study between the CUDD and BuDDy OBDD Package Applied to AI-Planning problems

  • Carnegie Mellon University
Research Output:
Book / Anthology / Report
Report

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Book / Anthology / Report
Report

Original language

English

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2002

Publication status

Published - 2002

Edition

Technical Report CMU-CS-02-173

Publisher

Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

This report describes a comparison study between the CUDD and BuDDy OBDD package. The performance of the two packages is evaluated on three sets of AI planning problems from the AIPS-98 and AIPS-00 planning competition. Our experiments indicate that CUDD has a slight implementation overhead compared to BuDDy. However, for some problems this overhead is overcome by the fact that CUDD can perform negation in constant time.

Access to documents

Final published version, 126.68 KB