Reflections Towards More Thoughtful Engagement with Literature Reviews in HCI

Raquel Robinson; Elisa Mekler

doi:10.1145/3686169.3686183

Reflections Towards More Thoughtful Engagement with Literature Reviews in HCI

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Literature reviews (or "lit reviews" for short) have become a popular way of knowing in HCI, yet there has been little reflection as to what we want from these reviews and how they can benefit the HCI design research community. Pushes toward more rigor and adopting standards within lit reviews often seem inappropriate and at odds with ways of knowing within the design research community. In this paper, we present critiques and associated risks of these viewpoints, and reflections towards a more thoughtful engagement with literature reviews in HCI design research. We open a discussion of how literature reviews currently inform research, and how we think they could better do so in the future

Original language	English
Title of host publication	HttF '24: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium
Publication date	21 Oct 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/3686169.3686183
Publication status	Published - 21 Oct 2024
Event	Symposium on Halfway to the Future - Santa Cruz, United States Duration: 21 Oct 2024 → 23 Oct 2024 https://www.halfwaytothefuture.net/2024/

Symposium

Symposium	Symposium on Halfway to the Future
Country/Territory	United States
City	Santa Cruz
Period	21/10/2024 → 23/10/2024
Internet address	https://www.halfwaytothefuture.net/2024/

Keywords

literature review
ways of knowing
systematic review
rigor
research synthesis
transparency

Access to Document

10.1145/3686169.3686183Licence: CC BY

RAGE: Rethinking Affective Game Epistemologies
Mekler, E. (PI) & Robinson, R. (CoI)
European Commission
01/05/2024 → 31/01/2031
Project: Research
Theorycraft: Bridging the Games Research-Practice Gap through Theory Translation
Mekler, E. (PI), Vornhagen, J. B. (CoI), Piitulainen, R. (CoI), Bennett, D. (CoI), Feng, F. (CoI), Robinson, R. (CoI), Wegmann, D. J. (CoI), Elvig, M. L. (Collaborator) & Murphy, D. J. (Collaborator)
European Commission
01/09/2022 → 31/08/2027
Project: Research

Cite this

@inproceedings{1bdc44eca22a42bdab9a5d6eedf3b783,

title = "Reflections Towards More Thoughtful Engagement with Literature Reviews in HCI",

abstract = "Literature reviews (or {"}lit reviews{"} for short) have become a popular way of knowing in HCI, yet there has been little reflection as to what we want from these reviews and how they can benefit the HCI design research community. Pushes toward more rigor and adopting standards within lit reviews often seem inappropriate and at odds with ways of knowing within the design research community. In this paper, we present critiques and associated risks of these viewpoints, and reflections towards a more thoughtful engagement with literature reviews in HCI design research. We open a discussion of how literature reviews currently inform research, and how we think they could better do so in the future",

keywords = "literature review, ways of knowing, systematic review, rigor, research synthesis, transparency",

author = "Raquel Robinson and Elisa Mekler",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1145/3686169.3686183",

language = "English",

booktitle = "HttF '24: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium",

note = "Symposium on Halfway to the Future, HTTF ; Conference date: 21-10-2024 Through 23-10-2024",

url = "https://www.halfwaytothefuture.net/2024/",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Reflections Towards More Thoughtful Engagement with Literature Reviews in HCI

AU - Robinson, Raquel

AU - Mekler, Elisa

PY - 2024/10/21

Y1 - 2024/10/21

N2 - Literature reviews (or "lit reviews" for short) have become a popular way of knowing in HCI, yet there has been little reflection as to what we want from these reviews and how they can benefit the HCI design research community. Pushes toward more rigor and adopting standards within lit reviews often seem inappropriate and at odds with ways of knowing within the design research community. In this paper, we present critiques and associated risks of these viewpoints, and reflections towards a more thoughtful engagement with literature reviews in HCI design research. We open a discussion of how literature reviews currently inform research, and how we think they could better do so in the future

AB - Literature reviews (or "lit reviews" for short) have become a popular way of knowing in HCI, yet there has been little reflection as to what we want from these reviews and how they can benefit the HCI design research community. Pushes toward more rigor and adopting standards within lit reviews often seem inappropriate and at odds with ways of knowing within the design research community. In this paper, we present critiques and associated risks of these viewpoints, and reflections towards a more thoughtful engagement with literature reviews in HCI design research. We open a discussion of how literature reviews currently inform research, and how we think they could better do so in the future

KW - literature review

KW - ways of knowing

KW - systematic review

KW - rigor

KW - research synthesis

KW - transparency

U2 - 10.1145/3686169.3686183

DO - 10.1145/3686169.3686183

M3 - Article in proceedings

BT - HttF '24: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium

T2 - Symposium on Halfway to the Future

Y2 - 21 October 2024 through 23 October 2024

ER -

Reflections Towards More Thoughtful Engagement with Literature Reviews in HCI

Abstract

Symposium

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

RAGE: Rethinking Affective Game Epistemologies

Theorycraft: Bridging the Games Research-Practice Gap through Theory Translation

Cite this