Abstract
We propose a Curry–Howard correspondence between a language for programming multiparty sessions and a generalisation of Classical Linear Logic (CLL). In this framework, propositions correspond to the local behaviour of a participant in a multiparty session type, proofs to processes, and proof normalisation to executing communications. Our key contribution is generalising duality, from CLL, to a new notion of n-ary compatibility, called coherence. Building on coherence as a principle of compositionality, we generalise the cut rule of CLL to a new rule for composing many processes communicating in a multiparty session. We prove the soundness of our model by showing the admissibility of our new rule, which entails deadlock-freedom via our correspondence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Acta Informatica |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 243-269 |
| ISSN | 0001-5903 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Local Type
- Proof System
- Linear Logic
- Parallel Composition
- Proof Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Multiparty session types as coherence proofs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver